Home
click opera - Hello -- and goodbye -- Cute Formalism!
July 2009
 
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
 
Sat, Feb. 25th, 2006 11:32 am
Hello -- and goodbye -- Cute Formalism!

Today I offer you

The sound of Japanese TV adverts (4 MB mono mp3 file, 8 mins. 56 secs.)

What emerges from this little collage of recordings I made yesterday afternoon is the image of a manically happy children's marching band, an insanely upbeat collective dedicated to toy robots, Disneyland and the future. (Oh, and private loans.) I would call the results "cute formalist", but unfortunately Wikipedia yesterday deleted their Cute Formalism entry. The deletion log explains their thinking:

"Lacks primary sources. I don't think it's so much crufty as it is non-notable... Upon searching google, the term "Cute formalism" gets aprox. 111 hits, which many of the links are from free dictionaries, livejournal/blogs, and wikipedia itself. Right in the article it states that one guy came up with the term 5 years ago. For a term that is 5 years old, you'd think if it were gonna catch on, it would've by now!... Delete as ill-fated neologism."

So farewell, then, Cute Formalism (2001-2006). We loved thee, but never really knew thee!

20CommentReplyAdd to MemoriesTell a Friend

stanleylieber
stanleylieber
Stanley Lieber
Sat, Feb. 25th, 2006 02:47 am (UTC)

I think if you want to get wikipedia entries to stick you need to insert whatever it is the article is about into a video game -- or perhaps SecondLife.


ReplyThread
scola
scola
Scola
Sat, Feb. 25th, 2006 04:12 am (UTC)

Or relate it somehow to Buffy the Vampire Slayer.


ReplyThread Parent
anglerfish96
anglerfish96
anglerfish96
Sat, Feb. 25th, 2006 03:16 am (UTC)

Oh, funny! I was just about to mention that stanleylieber had a similar run-in with wikipedia, himself, although not-so medium-profile as yourself. Personally, I think cute-formalism should definitely be included.


ReplyThread
anglerfish96
anglerfish96
anglerfish96
Sat, Feb. 25th, 2006 03:25 am (UTC)

Oh and isn't Audrey Hepburn lovely? She and Merle Oberon and Myrna Loy are the trifecta of western femininity.


ReplyThread Parent
anglerfish96
anglerfish96
anglerfish96
Sat, Feb. 25th, 2006 03:32 am (UTC)

And Barbara Stanwyck. Quadfecta. :P


ReplyThread Parent
imomus
imomus
imomus
Sat, Feb. 25th, 2006 03:30 am (UTC)

Oh, mine isn't a run-in with the Wiki kids. I'm still delighted to have my own Momus artist entry. And five years isn't a bad run for a concept that just popped into my head one day on Omote-Sando.


ReplyThread Parent
imomus
imomus
imomus
Sat, Feb. 25th, 2006 03:31 am (UTC)

I should add that I didn't start either the Wikipedia Cute Formalism entry or the Momus (artist) entry.


ReplyThread Parent
anglerfish96
anglerfish96
anglerfish96
Sat, Feb. 25th, 2006 03:41 am (UTC)

I know. In a way, it is comforting that wikipedia is so particular. But you should get your fanbase behind you! I would not hesitate in saying that cute formalism is an important term!


ReplyThread Parent
butterflyrobert
butterflyrobert
Robert Davis
Sat, Feb. 25th, 2006 07:28 pm (UTC)

I agree!


ReplyThread Parent
dzima
dzima
ralf dziminski
Sat, Feb. 25th, 2006 01:17 pm (UTC)

Last time I checked it, the entry about you said something along the lines of "Momus is fascinated by identity, Japan, the avant-garde, time travel, sex and Rhodri Marsden".

Someone must have 'corrected' it!


ReplyThread Parent
cheapsurrealist
cheapsurrealist
Dave Nold
Sat, Feb. 25th, 2006 03:22 am (UTC)

Ah Cute Formalism, we hardly knew ye. I guess there is no hope for Erotic Fomalism


ReplyThread
cityramica
cityramica
cityramica
Sat, Feb. 25th, 2006 04:46 am (UTC)

oh sigh i guess that means i'm dead too. :(
better throw away my marimekko placemats, robotic rabbits, and japanese schoolboy backpack.
i'll miss you, my gorgeous primary colored playground world....


ReplyThread
ex_mimic736
THE MMCSIS
Sat, Feb. 25th, 2006 06:19 am (UTC)
even errant entries deserve to die with dignity

Because I love ill-fated entries (and Borges), I once created Wekilledya: A Wikipedia Encyclobituary. As with most things it is no longer maintained.


ReplyThread
imomus
imomus
imomus
Sat, Feb. 25th, 2006 12:44 pm (UTC)
Re: even errant entries deserve to die with dignity

Encyclobituary is my "ill-fated neologism" of the month... especially apt that you've buried it with your neglect!


ReplyThread Parent
cap_scaleman
cap_scaleman
cap_scaleman
Sat, Feb. 25th, 2006 10:31 am (UTC)

This would be fun to base a song made out of these samples as beats or accompying!
But, why do I get up things like pizzicato five, pink floormats and cute multi-colored japanese text on a screen in my head when I listen to this? Sure feels weird...


ReplyThread
petit_paradis
petit_paradis
erik
Sat, Feb. 25th, 2006 11:43 am (UTC)
lily



dutch artist lily van der stokker still going cute


ReplyThread
imomus
imomus
imomus
Sat, Feb. 25th, 2006 12:45 pm (UTC)
Re: lily

Ah yes, I was looking at her work at Air de Paris in December. Took lots of surreptitious pictures...


ReplyThread Parent
hitori_photo
hitori_photo
hitori_photo
Sat, Feb. 25th, 2006 03:53 pm (UTC)

THanks. lol.


ReplyThread
jammypack
jammypack
Kebin
Sun, Feb. 26th, 2006 04:24 am (UTC)

That's sad, but also kind of interesting at the same time. I always wondered how and if Wikipedia was regulated. Interesting there's a human face on the deletion process, not just a quiet, unexplained disappearance.


ReplyThread
nato_dakke
nate
Mon, Feb. 27th, 2006 06:29 am (UTC)

momus is the eternal tourist, isn't he? It must be nice to still be surprised by bright and happy commercials, or even find them noteworthy. To me, it's almost like pointing out how often guitars appear in rock music.

It's just the paradigm of the genre. When I was watching Japanese commercials back in 97, the only difference was production values. I'm sure we could drop back another 9 years in time to the nyanko club era, and get commercials that sounded essentially the same.

Shame about cute formalism. Even without having been around in Japan though, momus seems to have moved forward a bit from that view particular take on things, no?


ReplyThread