?

Log in

No account? Create an account
Siding with Cage against Branca - click opera — LiveJournal
February 2010
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sun, Jan. 25th, 2009 04:02 am
Siding with Cage against Branca

70CommentReply

krskrft
krskrft
Mon, Jan. 26th, 2009 08:05 am (UTC)

Well, I think that being able to differentiate between "non-composition" and "composition" is a fair desire, and so for somebody to call that out as a "paradox" and then act like that ends the discussion is disingenuous. On the other hand, noting that a climax is what allows for dynamics, and expressing puzzlement at how somebody could really want to maintain the position that the climax is an inherently bad and oppressive thing (when really it is what makes the widest range of expression in music possible), isn't really an unfair use of the "I'ma call your shit a paradox" argument.

It's obvious that Cage intended to criticize the Wagnerian elements of the Branca piece, but in doing so he committed the all too common critical sin of overstating his case. It's quite alright to question the taste of a climax, or to criticize their traditional use, but to be against the musical climax? It's just silly. I think that if, by climax, he means the premeditated push toward some kind of cathartic moment, then perhaps he has a point, though I would argue that it's a case-by-case thing. Sometimes it works. Sometimes it's gratuitous. Sometimes it's just distasteful. Whatever.


ReplyThread Parent